Budget-Friendly
No entry fee—$50–100 per team.
Build fast. Prove it works.
An AI-enhanced rapid-prototyping challenge for university teams. No entry fee. No travel. Just 14 days to turn an ambitious idea into working hardware.
No entry fee—$50–100 per team.
All work in your own lab—focus on building, not logistics.
Use generative tools to ideate, code, and document faster.
Create a working prototype and a portfolio of your design, testing, and documentation.
Iterate fast, gather real data, deliver working hardware.
From the first preview to the final announcement, every team follows the same clear competition path.
Review the public project hint, schedule, prizes, and recommended tools and materials before committing.
Create your team profile, identify your university, and share each member's name, major, and college year.
When your team is ready, accept the agreement and reveal the full challenge. This starts your build timer.
Design, prototype, iterate, and validate the solution in your own makerspace before the timer expires.
Submit every required file, image, PDF, or link from the competition's submission-materials checklist.
After the competition closes, judges from sponsor organizations evaluate the completed submissions with the published rubric.
Final results, winners, scores, and judge feedback are published for participating teams.
This challenge falls broadly within recycling, sustainability, and resource-conscious engineering.
Teams should expect a challenge that may involve investigating how materials are currently used, discarded, processed, or recovered and considering how engineering could improve that system. Successful teams may need to combine research, experimentation, rapid prototyping, and ideas from multiple engineering disciplines.
The exact challenge objective will be revealed when the team's competition timer begins.
No specialized equipment is required in advance. Teams should have access to a general-purpose engineering prototyping workspace and should be prepared to experiment with physical materials.
Useful resources may include:
Teams are not expected to purchase challenge-specific materials before beginning. The exact materials and fabrication methods required will depend on the approach each team develops.
Past challenges and projects shared with permission. Competition submissions and judge feedback stay in participant dashboards.
No past competitions are published in this archive yet. Looking for an earlier event or project? Contact the organizers for available records.
This example shows the kinds of qualities Proto-Dash may value; it is not the scoring model for an active competition. Registered participants receive the published competition-specific rubric in their dashboard.
| Category | Description | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Functionality | Meets objective & captures relevant data. | 25% |
| Quality & Robustness | Reliable construction & repeatability. | 20% |
| Affordability | Cost-effective BOM & common tools. | 15% |
| Manufacturability | Easy to reproduce in a typical makerspace. | 15% |
| Documentation | Clear report, professional video, complete CAD & data. | 15% |
| Innovation | Creative AI use & sustainability impact. | 10% |
Yes — just disclose how they were used in your documentation.
We recommend 6–8 students per team. Smaller and larger teams are welcome unless an event specifies otherwise.
Any makerspace equipment & external services—just credit them.
No — an MVP with real data is the goal; document limitations.
Engineers from sponsor companies review asynchronously.
Email contact@proto-dash.com for more questions.